SofiaHelp
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • About
  • The AnchorSupervisor ConsoleReview what every trainee actually did — scale clinical case review across your whole cohort.See the console →
    Academic & TrainingSimulation SoftwareCategory & evaluation guideUniversitiesCounseling programs & departmentsInternship ProgramsAgencies placing cohortsSchool-Based CounselingInterns across many schoolsPilot & PricingScope a decision-ready rollout
    Clinical OrganizationsCommunity Behavioral HealthCCBHCs & CMHCsGroup PracticesAssociate teams & clinicsTrauma-Informed TrainingReadiness for the hardest cases
  • Contact
  • BlogPractice JourneysEvidenceReadiness AssessmentFaculty ToolkitCourse GuideEarly Usage Brief
  • Sign In
  • Try Free Session
SofiaHelpFeaturesPricingAbout
Contact
Sign InTry Free Session
SofiaHelp

Voice-based practice with fictional AI clients, structured feedback, and institutional review workflows for counseling training.

Product

FeaturesPricingSimulation SoftwareGet StartedBlogPractice JourneysFaculty Toolkit

For Programs

Supervisor ConsolePilot & Institutional PricingUniversitiesInternship ProgramsCommunity Behavioral HealthGroup PracticesTrauma-Informed TrainingSchool-Based CounselingCourse Implementation Guide

Company

AboutContactEvidence & MethodologyReadiness AssessmentEarly Usage Brief

Legal

Terms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Copyright © 2026 Grotek, Inc. All Rights ReservedTerms and Conditions | Privacy Policy |
Free planning tool

Is your counseling program ready for a simulation pilot?

Diagnose the training objective, faculty review capacity, measurement plan, and data boundary before you buy software or invite a cohort.

About three minutesNo email requiredDownloadable worksheet

Eight questions. One implementation profile.

Select the answer that describes your program today. No personal data is requested.

0 of 8 answered
1. We can name the specific counseling skill or course objective this pilot would address.
2. Learners currently have too few low-stakes opportunities to repeat that skill.
3. Faculty have an existing rubric or observable criteria for reviewing the skill.
4. A faculty owner can review a sample of practice evidence and lead the debrief.
5. We can define success without treating self-confidence as proof of competence.
6. We can instruct learners never to enter information about real clients or patients.
7. IT, privacy, and academic stakeholders can review the intended workflow before launch.
8. We have a cohort, course window, and decision date suitable for a contained pilot.

Your selections remain in this browser session. The tool sends only an aggregate profile and score to analytics if analytics measurement is enabled.

Use the result correctly

A program-planning profile, not a student assessment

The result organizes an implementation conversation. It does not measure counselor competence, predict practicum performance, determine accreditation alignment, or certify compliance.

Academic owner

Defines the learning target, teaching context, and faculty-owned criteria.

Risk owner

Reviews acceptable use, privacy, access expectations, and required review materials.

Decision owner

Sets the timeline, budget logic, and evidence required to continue, revise, or stop.

Need context before you assess readiness?

Review the category, evidence boundaries, and security model first.

See how simulation fitsReview evidence